Since January 1, 2025, the UK government has imposed a 20 percent Value Added Tax (VAT) on private school fees, while abolishing their charitable tax relief (HM Revenue & Customs 2024). This move aims to raise approximately £1.6 billion annually to invest in public education, with a particular focus on improving resources for disadvantaged students (Sibieta 2023). This policy stems from growing concerns about persistent educational inequalities in the UK, where private schools—attended by only 7 percent of students—have historically dominated access to elite universities and high-status careers (Sibieta 2023).

Private school students make up over 40 percent of Oxbridge admissions, despite representing a small fraction of the overall student population (Papadakis 2018). This highlights a cycle of privilege favoring wealthy families. Although introducing VAT on private schools is technically a regressive tax, it acts as a progressive tool for educational fairness.

The tax may raise private school fees, potentially pushing some middle-class families out of the market. However, the revenue could fund public education, such as hiring 6,500 new teachers or improving resources, key steps to reduce the attainment gap. While the exact impact is uncertain, the goal is clear: rebalance opportunities by redistributing advantages tied to wealth (OECD 2018).

Economists debate whether this VAT constitutes a progressive or regressive tax. While VAT is typically regressive, since a higher percentage of low-income budgets is allocated to consumption compared to higher budgets, its application to private schooling—a service predominantly used by the top 10 percent income bracket—may exhibit de facto progressivity (Bourdieu 1986, 241-258; Sibieta 2023). This means that the tax burden gradually increases in proportion to total income as income increases.

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs data reveals that families earning over £150,000 bear 68 percent of the tax burden (HM Revenue & Customs 2024). With less burden from schools and middle- or low-income families, this tax might successfully transfer consumer surplus from high-income classes to subsidize and provide resources to the majority of students attending public schools. Private school students primarily come from high-income brackets, whose demand for private education remains relatively insensitive to price changes. For example, when Eton College, the most prestigious private school in the UK, increased tuition by 20 percent to around £63,000 per year in 2023, high-net-worth families were more likely to adjust other expenses or use savings to maintain their children’s private education, with some relying on grandparents’ financial support or prepaid fees (Wardell and Frame 2024). This insensitivity is rooted in the perceived long-term benefits of private schooling, such as better university placements and social networks, and the fact that they earn a higher income.

In contrast, middle-class families face greater pressure. The additional 20 percent tax (approximately £3,000) on top of an annual tuition of around £15,000 forces them to reassess their educational choices. For many middle-income households, private schooling accounts for a significant share of discretionary spending, often exceeding 20 percent of their net income after housing costs (Coleman 1988). VAT, as a consumption tax, directly increases the cost of services rather than reducing income through direct taxation. Unlike wealthier households, which may treat private education as an inelastic good, middle-class parents must weigh rising educational costs against mortgage payments, pension contributions, and child-related expenditures, such as tutoring or extracurricular activities.

In this context, the imposition of VAT alters the relative price of private versus public education, effectively increasing the marginal cost of paying for private schooling. Parents who could barely afford private school before may now reconsider its worth, especially if public schools nearby have improved or if their results are comparable. The budget surplus has led to a sharp rise in students switching from private to public schools, highlighting the policy’s immediate impact on middle-class school choices. Economically, this suggests a price elasticity of demand that is higher than for wealthier groups, supporting the view that consumption taxes can create regressive pinch points for the upper-middle class even when targeted.

While this influx could intensify competition for public school resources in the short term, the government estimates that the state system has sufficient capacity to absorb additional students due to projected demographic shifts, including declines in the UK school-age population by 2030 (Hughes and Borret 2024; EB News 2025). However, this reallocation also raises questions of transitional equity, a process designed to protect vulnerable groups from being harmed due to cost cuts. Middle-class families may experience a decline in educational quality, leading to dissatisfaction or an increased reliance on supplemental education services. Thus, while this VAT primarily targets wealthier households, its secondary effects on the middle class are still non-negligible.

When middle-class families enroll in state schools, they often advocate for better resources—such as smaller classes or improved facilities—leading to policy changes. Their involvement can create a cycle of demand-driven school improvements. In the UK, a 2023 report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) noted that areas with higher proportions of middle-class state school attendees had 15 percent more per-pupil funding and 20 percent lower teacher turnover rates, suggesting that parental engagement is correlated with tangible systemic improvements (Sibieta 2023). Thus, the VAT policy may primarily affect wealthier households, but middle-class advocacy for better state schools could also improve equity in the long term.

For low-income households, private school fees already far exceed public education costs, with £15,200 for private schools versus negligible expenses for public schools from 2022–23 (Sibieta 2023). Therefore, the VAT has a minimal impact on their choices, as their children mainly depend on the public education system. However, the policy indirectly affects them through potential improvements in public school quality funded by the new tax revenue.

A notable exception is the Haredi Jewish community, which comprises around 2.1-2.4 million people in 2024, with 81 percent of children attending private schools due to religious education requirements (Possener 2024). These schools often charge lower fees and lack the financial reserves of elite institutions, making them particularly vulnerable to VAT-induced cost increases. This could disproportionately burden Haredi families, who already face higher-than-average childcare costs, as most of them prefer private schools over public schools and have larger family sizes, indicating heavier financial pressure from tuition (Possener 2024).

The policy may have both positive and negative effects on educational resource distribution: the government plans to use new tax revenue to hire teachers and increase public school funding (Taylor 2024). If a VAT is imposed, additional funds and budget will be made available to cover salaries for new teachers. The policy’s side effects deserve closer examination—critics have highlighted a significant loophole in its design, whereby elite private schools like Eton can claim back VAT funds in the medium term, potentially undermining the revenue intended for public education. As reported by The Guardian in October 2024, this loophole allows schools to restructure as educational charities or access tax relief via investment schemes, effectively reducing the tax burden on the wealthiest institutions (Partington and Elgot 2024).

Positive externalities could emerge if tax-funded public education upgrades improve not only academic outcomes but also long-term workforce productivity and economic inclusion. Conversely, negative externalities are evident in the potential disruption to specialized services: many UK private schools provide specialized SEN (Special Educational Needs) programs to support students with autism or dyslexia. Data from the UK Department for Education shows that approximately 12 percent of SEN students in England attend private schools, where these programs are delivered with 30 percent fewer per-pupil costs than state systems (UK Parliament 2023). Their potential closure risks transferring significant financial and logistical burdens onto local authorities, exemplifying a reduction of positive externality market failure where private provision effectively serves public needs—a factor often overlooked in cost-benefit analyses.

Critics’ concerns about talent cultivation overlook a fundamental truth: when 93 percent of students rely on public education—with private schools educating just 7 percent of the population—improving public quality through VAT redistribution yields greater societal returns than preserving elite enclaves (Haveman and Wolfe 1984). Nations with strong public systems (e.g., Finland) outperform UK private schools in Programme for International Student Assessment scores by an average of 12 percent, proving that equity and excellence can coexist (OECD 2018). This shift might initially spark concerns about the development of high-skilled talent, but improved public education quality, funded by taxes, could offset this loss.

Compared to countries like Switzerland and Singapore, which impose low taxes on private education, the UK’s policy may influence the decision of high-net-worth families to remain in the UK. However, the global reputation of UK private schools could still attract international students, partially mitigating the decline in domestic demand and thereby balancing the enrollment of students across different backgrounds. For example, while people might generally think that a price increase will lead to a decrease in quantity demanded, Eton College reports a 15 percent increase in applications from overseas families since the policy announcement, driven by its brand recognition despite higher costs (Wardell and Frame 2024).

Bibliography

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital,” in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson. Greenwood Press, 1986.

Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): S95–S120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243.

EB News. 2025. “School Numbers Expected to Drop in 2030.” Education Business UK. https://educationbusinessuk.net/news/18072025/school-numbers-expected-drop-2030.

Haveman, Robert H., and Barbara Wolfe. 1984. “Schooling and Economic Well-being: The Role of Non-Market Effects.” Journal of Human Resources 19 (3): 377–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/145879.

HM Revenue & Customs. 2024. “Private School Fees — VAT Measure.” UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/ government/publications/vat-on-private-school-fees/applying-vat-to-private-school-fees.

Hughes, Laura and Amy Borrett. 2024. “State Schools Have Enough Space for Exodus of Private Pupils.” Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/31460ce0-c0ba-4c1d-8006-43cb698234e2.

OECD. 2018. “Equity in Education: Breaking Down Barriers to Social Mobility.” PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en.

Papadakis, Saskia. 2018. “Elites and Their Teachers.” Discover Society. https://archive.discoversociety.org/2018/04/03/elites-and-their-teachers/.

Partington, Richard, and Jessica Elgot. 2024. “Budget 2024: Reeves Reveals £40bn in Tax Rises as She Promises to Rebuild Public Services.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/30/autumn-budget-2024-rachel-reeves-tax-rises-public-services

Possener, Adam. 2024. “The Introduction of VAT on Private School Fees Will Have a Disproportionate Impact on Haredi Families in the UK.” Institute for Jewish Policy Research. https://www.jpr.org.uk/insights/introduction-vat-private-school-fees-will-have-disproportionate-impact-haredi-families-uk.

Sibieta, Luke. 2023. “Tax, Private School Fees and State School Spending.” Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1920/re.ifs.2023.0263.

Taylor, Harry. 2024. “Government Plans to Introduce VAT on Private School Fees Deeply Misguided – Tice.” The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/vat-richard-tice-bridget-phillipson-government-commons-b2609662.html

UK Parliament. 2023. “Special Educational Needs and Disability: An Analysis and Summary of Data Sources.” Department of Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov. uk/media/66bdc2de3effd5b79ba490fd/Special_educational_needs_and_disability_analysis_and_summary_of_data_sources_Aug24.pdf

Wardell, Alistair and Andrew Frame. 2024. “VAT on Independent School Fees: How Can the Sector Adapt?.” Grant Thornton UK. https://www.grantthornton.co.uk/ insights/vat-on-independent-school-fees-how-can-the-sector-adapt/.